Take Multiple Blood Pressure Readings for Lower BP

Blood pressure is a very controversial topic. Before you know it, they might say you should take medication when you actually don’t need it.

Apart from the usual “white coat hypertension”, the nervousness of coming to a doctor’s office causing a spike in your blood pressure, there appears to be something else wrong with taking the blood pressure reading only once.

Sure your doctor is very busy and it takes time to do the reading properly, but would you rather take medications for decades that you don’t need? I think everyone should insist that their blood pressure is taken accurately, and when doing it at home yourself it pays off to stick to the rules. Check out this article for in-depth information on how blood pressure should be taken: “Reading Blood Pressure: Do It Wrong and It Will Be Too High“.

Now what sticks out in that article are three things in my opinion that do not get enough attention, be it at the doctor’s office or in the user manual of your automated blood pressure monitor:

  1. the entire arm must be supported at heart level, for five minutes before you take the reading. How many times was this done properly, do you remember?
  2. you must absolutely wait 5-10 minutes or longer and relax.
  3. you need to take the blood pressure up to 5 times in a row without a pause if the values are elevated, until you get a stable measurement.

Now this is really interesting. Consider a typical measurement that I did a while back:

152/91 here I get nervous obviously, but then ..:
135/91
131/85
128/85
130/86

Right arm (only one measurement):
131/84

Note that I did switch arms at the end for the final reading and the above measurements were taken in rapid succession, one after the other without a pause. As Dr. Batmanghelidj describes in his article, for some people, the first measurement is very high. A signal is sent to the brain to temporarily increase blood pressure because a blockage was detected. The blood pressure later normalizes; hence, after a couple measurements, the numbers stabilize to show your true blood pressure.

I have done the above experiment with two different blood pressure monitors, the second is a fairly expensive Omron product which I checked against a manual sphygmomanometer. The effect is always present, sometimes less dramatic, especially if the first reading is lower to begin with. For other people, however, usually the ones who have a normal range blood pressure reading in the beginning, the numbers remain about the same, despite repeated readings. This makes me believe that there may be an anatomical difference causing this effect in some people.

Is it reliable to measure 5 times in a row?

It appears when Dr. Batmanghelidj described his method, there was no scientific evidence back then but he knew from countless patients in his own experience that it is accurate. I have done some research to prove that taking many readings is not only accurate, it’s actually necessary for proper diagnosis of hypertension.

See:

Thirty-Minute Office Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care

Quote: “OBP30 yields considerably lower blood pressure readings than OBP in all studied patient groups. OBP30 is a promising technique to reduce overtreatment of white-coat hypertension in primary health care.” What is OBP30? It’s a technique of repeating the BP measurements many times within 30 minutes: “OBP30 is performed with the patient sitting alone and undisturbed during 30 minutes while the blood pressure is measured automatically every 5 minutes, producing 7 readings. The resulting OBP30 is the mean of the last 6 blood pressure readings.”

Serial blood pressure measurements

In the above study they investigated and found that venous congestion does not have an effect on the BP accuracy. Some physicians believe that taking the BP too soon will lead to false low readings. This study confirms what I have been measuring, see example above, that’s why I switched arms and measured the right arm just once. I wanted to exclude the possibility of getting a false low reading on the left because of venous congestion due to having compressed the arm five times in succession.

Quote: “There was no increase in arterial blood pressure (ABP) oscillations when successive ABP readings were taken without an interval or even with venous congestion interposed. Contrary to the present belief, there seems to be no loss of reliability when blood pressure recordings are taken immediately one after another, in the clinical setting.

Reading Blood Pressure: Do It Wrong and It Will Be Too High

 

Quote: “When the blood pressure cuff is tightened on your arm, the brain receives a signal. That signal, increase the blood pressure to compensate for the blockage. It is not until you pump up and release the blood pressure cuff 3 to 5 times that you will get an accurate reading. The difference in the first reading to the last could increased by 10 points or more.

Try It Yourself: If you have an automatic blood pressure cuff, take your blood pressure 5 times in a row. As soon as it deflates, re-inflate it. Write down the measurements each time. Note what the last three are. You will be surprised at the results.

 

Prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension due to inaccurate blood pressure measurement

In the above article they describe how measuring BP properly and repeatedly prevents 33% of patients to be wrongly diagnosed with hypertension.

Reactive rise in blood pressure upon cuff inflation: cuff inflation at the arm causes a greater rise in pressure than at the wrist in hypertensive patients

The above article describes the phenomenon of how blood pressure rises abruptly when the cuff is inflated (‘reactive rise’).

Effect of anticipation and cuff inflation on blood pressure during self-measurement

In this article they call the ‘reactive rise’ phenomenon ‘pressor response’. Quote: “Our results support the existence of a pressor response during self-BP measurement that remains present after multiple BP readings.

Principles and techniques of blood pressure measurement

In the above article they call it “cuff inflation hypertension”. Quote: “Cuff-inflation hypertension: Although in most patients the act of inflating a sphygmomanometer cuff does not itself change the blood pressure, as shown by intra-arterial62 and Finapres87 recordings, in occasional patients there may be a transient but substantial increase of up to 40 mm Hg coinciding with cuff inflation…”

Also they show in the illustration below why it is very critical to support the entire arm at heart level, compare the BP values below in A and B, and notice that in A the arm is at heart level, perpendicular to the torso:

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is nihms462201f3.jpg

Misleading measurements of blood pressure among the elderly

Quote: “…Cuff-inflation hypertension may also easily be confused with pseudohypertension and may even be considered in the differential diagnosis of of resistant hypertension if physicain is not aware of this entity. Cuff-inflation hypertension is induced by the excess and the rapid inflation of of cuff to a level far above the systolic blood pressure and by the muscular activity associated with the inflating cuff, while blood pressure is measured [2]. A neurogenic theory has also been postulated. It can be diagnosed by comparing the directly measured intraarterial diastolic pressure both before and after cuff inflation, and at the korotkoff phase V.

 

Blood pressure difference between the measurements taken during cuff inflation and deflation

In the articles above there are references to wrist measuring devices. I happen to have two. The ‘reactive rise’ in blood pressure as seen by my measurements showed above does not occur in one of my wrist devices. The very peculiar thing about that device is that it measures BP while inflating, not deflating. So unlike upper arm devices, it doesn’t inflate the cuff quickly and then release slowly. It pumps up very slowly and then abruptly finishes and deflates. It appears the measurements taken with that device do not show a reactive rise or ‘cuff inflation hypertension’. I suspect it’s because there is no reaction taking place because there is no sudden blockage in blood flow. The article above shows some real data that might confirm what I have been seeing perhaps what Dr. Batmanghelidj meant in his description:

Quote: “…The manual SBP measured during cuff inflation was significantly lower by 4.3 mmHg (mean±SD: 110.6±9.7 vs 114.9±9.0) than that measured during cuff deflation…”

 

Accuracy in blood pressure monitoring: The effect of noninvasive blood pressure cuff inflation on intra-arterial blood pressure values

Quote: “This study showed that there is a transient reactive rise in IABP [invasive arterial blood pressure] values with NIBP [noninvasive BP] cuff inflation. … The exact mechanism for this effect is not known but may be attributed to the pain and discomfort from cuff inflation.

The above study might be also describing the same phenomenon that was picked up by Dr. Batmanghelidj.

 

Simultaneous Compared With Sequential Blood Pressure Measurement Results in Smaller Inter‐Arm Blood Pressure Differences

The above article has again support for the phenomenon that the first measurement is in general higher than subsequent measurements. Quote: “…the first sequential measurement was on average higher than the second, suggesting an order effect…Previous studies have shown that unilateral cuff inflation may increase SBP from 4 mm Hg to 9 mm Hg. Explanatory mechanisms include muscle compression, pain and discomfort during the measurement, and increased arousal as a result of the knowledge that BP is being measured.” Also they confirm the existence of a BP rise phenomenon when the cuff is inflated.

My Recommendation

Remember this is not medical advice and I’m not a physician. However, if your BP reading is higher than what is considered desired, I would definitely insist on having the blood pressure taken properly, as described by Dr Batmanghelidj and many other physicians, which is also what the Merck Manual describes: the entire arm must be supported at heart level, you need to be relaxed for at least 5 minutes, back supported, feet on the ground, no talking, etc. If you are worried or stressed the reading will be much higher than your usual BP. If the arm is not correctly positioned for 5 minutes at heart level, it can lead to a reading 10-20 points higher.

What can go wrong when measuring blood pressure?

A lot can go wrong when you measure blood pressure incorrectly. See “Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients’ resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review“. As far as I know, all errors result in higher blood pressure readings, except one: if you hold the arm above heart level. In real-life you will find that at least one or two errors in the list below were made, so you need to watch out, whether it’s at home or at the doctor’s office:

Interesting enough, the article mentions ‘interval between repeated measurements’. They cite two studies:

 

Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit 2008; 13:333–338. [PubMed
Quote: “Automated measurement of BP in the office setting with devices such as the BpTRU can be taken as frequently as every 1 min without affecting the accuracy of the reading. Small differences in BP between the 1 and 2-min settings and between the automated BpTRU and ABP readings were within accepted clinical standards for validation criteria.
Yarows SA, Patel K, Brook R. Rapid oscillometric blood pressure measurement compared to conventional oscillometric measurement. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6:145–147. [PubMed]
Quote: “It is concluded that a 15-second interval between blood pressure readings is as accurate as a one-minute interval providing that these measurements are started after a 5-minute rest period”

Conclusion

I hope the above research will help people discover their true blood pressure and perhaps avoid over-medication and over-treatment in people who don’t need treatment. After all, medication has side effects and if there is a way to avoid the medication it makes sense to look at it in more detail.
Please use the comments section below to add your perspective.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *