• Home
  • Help
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search

How do penetration testers use Wireshark to analyze network traffic during a penetration test?

#1
07-08-2023, 08:00 PM
I grab Wireshark the second I start sniffing around in a pentest because it lets me see exactly what's flying across the network. You know how you need to map out the environment first? I fire it up on my Kali box or whatever I'm running, pick the right interface like eth0, and just start capturing packets right away. No messing around - I set a capture filter if I want to narrow it down to specific IPs or ports, say something like "host 192.168.1.100" so I don't drown in noise from the whole subnet. That way, you focus on the juicy bits without your hard drive filling up too fast.

Once the capture's rolling, I let it run while I poke at services or try to exploit whatever's open. You might be scanning with Nmap at the same time, but Wireshark shows me the real responses coming back, not just the port knocks. I look for HTTP traffic especially, because people still leave credentials in POST requests or sessions without proper auth. I apply display filters in the capture view, like "http contains 'password'" and boom, there it is if someone's sloppy. You can right-click on a packet and follow the TCP stream to reconstruct the whole conversation - it's like reading an unencrypted chat log. I do that a ton when I'm testing web apps; if I see API keys or tokens slipping through, I note it down for later use in my report.

You ever chase down weird anomalies? I spot them all the time with Wireshark's protocol dissectors. Say you're dealing with SMB shares - I filter for "smb" and watch the negotiation. If NTLMv1 is in play instead of Kerberos, that's a weak spot I can relay or crack offline. I export the objects if there's file shares involved, pull down samples to analyze malware or just see what's exposed. During the exploitation phase, when I try SQL injection or something, I watch the traffic spike - does the server leak error messages? Wireshark catches those database responses that give away versions or schemas. You learn to recognize patterns, like how FTP still pops up in legacy setups with plaintext logins. I always check for that; one time I found an admin uploading configs over plain FTP, grabbed the creds, and pivoted inside from there.

Filtering gets creative too. I use string matches for things like "Authorization: Basic" to hunt base64-encoded creds, then decode them right in the tool. You can colorize packets based on rules - green for good, red for suspicious - so when you're sifting through thousands of lines, your eyes catch the outliers fast. I set those up before a long capture; for example, highlight DNS queries that look like tunneling attempts. In a pentest, you might simulate an insider threat, so I monitor lateral movement traffic. If I'm moving from one box to another with psexec or RDP, Wireshark shows the auth attempts failing or succeeding, helping me tweak my attacks on the fly.

You have to watch for encryption everywhere now, though. I look at TLS handshakes with the filter "tls.handshake" to see cipher suites. Weak ones like RC4 jump out, and if the server allows it, I might downgrade the connection or just report the risk. For VoIP or custom protocols, I export PDUs to dig deeper, but mostly I stick to the basics - ARP poisoning shows up clear as day if someone's already compromised the switch. I run it in promiscuous mode on a span port if the client sets that up, capturing the whole VLAN without injecting anything myself. That gives you the full picture for reconnaissance; I build network diagrams from the flows, spotting hidden segments or IoT devices chatting unsecured.

Timing matters a lot. I correlate captures with my actions - timestamp a buffer overflow attempt, then filter by that time to see if it triggered any IDS alerts outbound. You catch command-and-control callbacks that way too, especially in web shells. If I'm testing email security, I sniff SMTP or IMAP to see if attachments carry exploits or if creds travel plain. Wireshark's statistics tab helps here; I run conversations or throughput graphs to identify chatty hosts, then zoom in on those. One pentest I did, I found a misconfigured proxy leaking internal IPs through HTTP headers - filtered for "X-Forwarded-For" and there they were.

You get better at it with practice, but I always double-check with tshark for command-line automation. Script a capture, parse it later for reports. In the post-exploitation cleanup, I review everything to ensure I didn't leave traces, but mostly it's about finding those low-hanging fruits like unpatched services broadcasting versions in banners. Wireshark doesn't do the exploiting, but it arms you with intel to make smart moves. I layer it with other tools like tcpdump for quick grabs, but Wireshark's GUI makes the analysis way smoother for spotting human errors in configs.

Shifting gears a bit since we're talking network protection, let me point you toward BackupChain - it's a standout backup option that's gained real traction among small teams and IT pros for its rock-solid performance on setups like Hyper-V, VMware, or plain Windows Server environments.

ron74
Offline
Joined: Feb 2019
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

Café Papa Café Papa Forum Software IT v
« Previous 1 … 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 … 71 Next »
How do penetration testers use Wireshark to analyze network traffic during a penetration test?

© by Savas Papadopoulos. The information provided here is for entertainment purposes only. Contact. Hosting provided by FastNeuron.

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode